Ok y’all brace yourselves cuz I just learned about a new animal
Yes, that is an animal. Yes, scientists refer to it as the purple sock worm. No, that’s not it’s real name, silly, it’s real name is Xenoturbella!
When these deep-sea socks were first discovered, no one knew what the fuck they were looking at (and, really, can you blame them?). They have no eyes, brains, or digestive tracts. They are literally just a bag of wet slop. DNA analysis initially seemed to indicate that they were related to mollusks, until the scientists realized that DNA sample was from the clams they had recently eaten (yes, they can eat with no organs. We don’t know how.)
Scientists then analyzed the data again and tentatively placed them in the group that includes acorn worms, saying that their ancestors probably had eyes, brains, and organs, but simplified as a response to their deep sea ecosystems.
Later DNA testing has since shown that they are their own thing! Xenoturbella, along with another simple and problematic to place creature called acoelomorphs, belong to their own phylum called Xenacelomorpha! This places them as the sister group to all bilateral animals. So, they just never evolved brains, eyes, or organs. They are a glimpse at a very primitive form of animal that never bothered to change, because apparently what they do works. Rock on, purple sock worm.
Extremely dangerous how “grooming” in the context of child sexual abuse went from being a very specific pattern of isolation and trust-building with the aim of abusing someone to “telling children anything that contradicts their parents’ ultra-conservative worldview is grooming” to “selling rainbow flags in a store is grooming” to “literally anyone I don’t like is a groomer”.
These days the word seems to most often be used by people who don’t care about what it actually means and just want an easy “this person is irredeemably evil, kill them now” button.
And it’s a whole bunch of projection if we’re talking about purely ideological grooming and not just the sexual kind.
